In which situation would adding a leader be least likely to improve performance?

Adding a leader is least likely to improve performance when experts gather to discuss mutual interests. In this scenario, the individuals involved are typically well-informed and possess significant expertise in their respective fields. The nature of the gathering suggests a degree of autonomy and self-direction among the experts, meaning they are likely capable of navigating discussions and making decisions independently without the need for leadership intervention.

In situations where team members are unsure of their objectives, have fragmented dynamics, or are dealing with complex problems requiring collaboration, the presence of a leader is beneficial. A leader can provide clarity, facilitate communication, and promote cohesion in these contexts. However, when experts are aligned on shared interests, they can engage in meaningful dialogue and collaboration without needing an authoritative figure to guide or direct them, diminishing the potential impact of adding a leader.